Jonathan Mridha vs Kevin Edengren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Effectiveness: In the recent past, Mridha has won 47.1% of points on second serve compared to Edengren's 43.37%. This edge in second serve performance may contribute to match outcome predictions.
• Return Game Strength: Mridha excels in return points, clinching 50.97% of opponent's second serves, notably higher than Edengren's 42.16%.
• First Serve Return: Both players have similar first serve return stats, with Mridha having a slight lead at 28.98%, compared to Edengren's 28.19%.
• Under Pressure Performance: Mridha saves a greater percentage of breakpoints (56.84%) than Edengren (51.09%), indicating better performance under pressure.
• Performance Overview: Over the past year, Edengren has won a higher percentage of matches (68.57%) compared to Mridha (45.45%). Does Edengren’s better overall win percentage imply a potential advantage?
• Surface Success: Edengren performs best on clay (61% win-rate), while Mridha shows strength on hard courts (60% win-rate). Could the surface of the upcoming match swing the advantage in favor of one player?
• Player Level: Both have predominantly played in lower-tier tournaments, but Edengren showcases a stronger performance profile (68.57% winning rate) than Mridha (45.45%).
• Opponent Quality: Edengren has faced tougher opposition, with opponents averaging a rank of 147.34, compared to Mridha’s average opponent rank of 359.09.
• Deciding Set Performance: If the match reaches a deciding set, Edengren has a pronounced advantage, winning 71% of such sets compared to Mridha’s 40%.
• Break Point Conversion: Mridha demonstrates superior breakpoint conversion (58.54%) versus Edengren’s 36.36%, crucial for shifting momentum during the match.

Editorial Prediction (August 19, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing the upcoming match between Edengren and Mridha, several key statistics indicate areas of strength and weakness for each player. Mridha shows a stronger performance on both second serve and return games, which could be decisive in gaining the upper hand during rallies. This advantage in breakpoint conversion further bolsters Mridha’s ability to capitalize on crucial opportunities.

However, Edengren's consistent performance over the past year, coupled with a superior record against higher-ranked opponents, suggests a competitive edge in match temperament and experience. Edengren's proficiency in deciding set scenarios indicates resilience and the ability to thrive under pressure.

Taking into account surface preference and overall win rates, each player holds potential depending on the playing conditions. Ultimately, despite Mridha’s strengths in serve returns and breakpoint conversion, Edengren's solid form, experience, and success against quality opposition tip the balance in their favor.

Based on the current data, Edengren is more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.